<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomaswhitley.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomaswhitley.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:25:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marriage Equality and Presidential Character by Thomas Whitley</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/10/marriage-equality-and-presidential-character/#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Whitley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571307#comment-1042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No worries. I took it in a general, plural sense. Both of your points are valid. We do accept some forms of &quot;separate but equal&quot; and not others. And I agree about the character of an administration my main point, though, was that it is a bit ironic to see Mohler making such a claim about Obama when that level of issue so obviously plagues Romney to a much greater degree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries. I took it in a general, plural sense. Both of your points are valid. We do accept some forms of &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; and not others. And I agree about the character of an administration my main point, though, was that it is a bit ironic to see Mohler making such a claim about Obama when that level of issue so obviously plagues Romney to a much greater degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marriage Equality and Presidential Character by Ryan Corbello</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/10/marriage-equality-and-presidential-character/#comment-1041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Corbello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571307#comment-1041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just re-read my comment, and I&#039;m regretting my wording in the last paragraph.  I intended it to sound less personal than it does.  I meant &quot;your&quot; in the plural sense.  And if I had it to do over again I&#039;d soften it a bit.  My apologies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just re-read my comment, and I&#8217;m regretting my wording in the last paragraph.  I intended it to sound less personal than it does.  I meant &#8220;your&#8221; in the plural sense.  And if I had it to do over again I&#8217;d soften it a bit.  My apologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Marriage Equality and Presidential Character by Ryan Corbello</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/10/marriage-equality-and-presidential-character/#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Corbello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571307#comment-1040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your &quot;separate but equal&quot; argument is an interesting one.  The thought has crossed my mind that  Civil Unions might be the only middle ground that both sides could live with.  Christian conservatives get to keep their definition of marriage, while gays get the rights and privileges they&#039;ve been fighting for.  And for what its worth, &quot;separate but equal&quot; has been working for decades under different name.  After all, (tax-payer funded) collegiate sports have been operating on a separate but equal basis, down to the dollar, since Title 9 was passed in the 70s.  Most people, for whatever reason, take at face value that &quot;separate but equal&quot; is evil with respect to race, but necessary with regard to sex.  I don&#039;t know how I feel about it.

As far as the discussion of character goes: if the fate of our country is left to the character of our politicians, we&#039;re in sore shape.  Anyone who thinks that this current administration (or any other) operates like an episode of The West Wing, is truly wearing rose-colored glasses, and that Kool-Aid in your stomach may soon turn sour...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; argument is an interesting one.  The thought has crossed my mind that  Civil Unions might be the only middle ground that both sides could live with.  Christian conservatives get to keep their definition of marriage, while gays get the rights and privileges they&#8217;ve been fighting for.  And for what its worth, &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; has been working for decades under different name.  After all, (tax-payer funded) collegiate sports have been operating on a separate but equal basis, down to the dollar, since Title 9 was passed in the 70s.  Most people, for whatever reason, take at face value that &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; is evil with respect to race, but necessary with regard to sex.  I don&#8217;t know how I feel about it.</p>
<p>As far as the discussion of character goes: if the fate of our country is left to the character of our politicians, we&#8217;re in sore shape.  Anyone who thinks that this current administration (or any other) operates like an episode of The West Wing, is truly wearing rose-colored glasses, and that Kool-Aid in your stomach may soon turn sour&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s Your Atonement Theory? by Joshua D. Woods</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2009/01/22/whats-your-atonement-theory/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua D. Woods]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/post/72430350#comment-1039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irenaeus&#039; was the Recapitualation theory wasn&#039;t he?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irenaeus&#8217; was the Recapitualation theory wasn&#8217;t he?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NC Pastor Advocates Punching Possibly Gay Children, Church Laughs by moaudie</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/03/nc-pastor-advocates-punching-possibly-gay-children-church-laughs/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moaudie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 11:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571292#comment-1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A wonderful, thoughtful and heartfelt commentary that I support completely. I agree with you and Ryan and my passion lies in the violence against anyone, particularly children so this boils my blood. I can not support bigotry in any form and so much of the conversations clearly lead to that stance. A very sad display of ignorance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wonderful, thoughtful and heartfelt commentary that I support completely. I agree with you and Ryan and my passion lies in the violence against anyone, particularly children so this boils my blood. I can not support bigotry in any form and so much of the conversations clearly lead to that stance. A very sad display of ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NC Pastor Advocates Punching Possibly Gay Children, Church Laughs by Thomas Whitley</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/03/nc-pastor-advocates-punching-possibly-gay-children-church-laughs/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Whitley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 21:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571292#comment-1037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said, Ryan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Ryan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NC Pastor Advocates Punching Possibly Gay Children, Church Laughs by Ryan Corbello</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/03/nc-pastor-advocates-punching-possibly-gay-children-church-laughs/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Corbello]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571292#comment-1036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t heard Sean Harris&#039; remarks, and if I&#039;m being honest, I don&#039;t want to.  Listening to bigots is bad enough, but when they purport to serve the same God I do, it just makes me nauseous.
 
Last I heard, Amendment One is expected to pass with around 57% of the vote.  I, for one, will be voting against, mostly for political reasons.  I don&#039;t think government has any business in marriage - gay, straight or otherwise.  I don&#039;t know the implications of the amendment on domestic disputes, but my friends that are lawyers say it won&#039;t change anything, and that stands to reason; no laws are being changed, and as it stands: violence is violence, irrespective of marriage or sexual orientation.

What I notice among Christians seems mostly to be a generational gap.  My parents generation seems overwhelmingly for &quot;one man, one woman&quot; while my generation seems to be largely &quot;live and let live.&quot;  I agree that with time we will see the laws changed to reflect the newer generation&#039;s view, but now the tide seems stagnant.

For my part, I will continue nudging the Right in the direction they ought to move, perhaps with rhetoric such as this: I&#039;m a fan of the Constitution; especially the part that says government can&#039;t do for one, what it&#039;s unwilling to do for another.  We call it the Equal Protection Clause, and its one of the reasons I like living here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard Sean Harris&#8217; remarks, and if I&#8217;m being honest, I don&#8217;t want to.  Listening to bigots is bad enough, but when they purport to serve the same God I do, it just makes me nauseous.</p>
<p>Last I heard, Amendment One is expected to pass with around 57% of the vote.  I, for one, will be voting against, mostly for political reasons.  I don&#8217;t think government has any business in marriage &#8211; gay, straight or otherwise.  I don&#8217;t know the implications of the amendment on domestic disputes, but my friends that are lawyers say it won&#8217;t change anything, and that stands to reason; no laws are being changed, and as it stands: violence is violence, irrespective of marriage or sexual orientation.</p>
<p>What I notice among Christians seems mostly to be a generational gap.  My parents generation seems overwhelmingly for &#8220;one man, one woman&#8221; while my generation seems to be largely &#8220;live and let live.&#8221;  I agree that with time we will see the laws changed to reflect the newer generation&#8217;s view, but now the tide seems stagnant.</p>
<p>For my part, I will continue nudging the Right in the direction they ought to move, perhaps with rhetoric such as this: I&#8217;m a fan of the Constitution; especially the part that says government can&#8217;t do for one, what it&#8217;s unwilling to do for another.  We call it the Equal Protection Clause, and its one of the reasons I like living here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NC Gay Marriage Ban by NC Pastor Advocates Punching Possibly Gay Children, Church Laughs &#124;</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/03/30/nc-gay-marriage-ban/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NC Pastor Advocates Punching Possibly Gay Children, Church Laughs &#124;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571282#comment-1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Baptists. There voice has remained on the sidelines for far to long and voices like Harris&#8217;, Richard Land&#8217;s, and Al Mohler&#8217;s have been allowed to dominate the discussion when it comes to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Baptists. There voice has remained on the sidelines for far to long and voices like Harris&#8217;, Richard Land&#8217;s, and Al Mohler&#8217;s have been allowed to dominate the discussion when it comes to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summer Plans by Maria</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/01/summer-plans/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 06:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571288#comment-1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thomas, we hope to see you and Trinity backen Sweden soon. I can&#039;t believe it is already 6 years since you visited us in Stockholm.  Great memories! Magnus got two bikes (fast ones!) and would really enjoy your company. Take care! /Maria]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, we hope to see you and Trinity backen Sweden soon. I can&#8217;t believe it is already 6 years since you visited us in Stockholm.  Great memories! Magnus got two bikes (fast ones!) and would really enjoy your company. Take care! /Maria</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Summer Plans by court</title>
		<link>http://thomaswhitley.com/2012/05/01/summer-plans/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[court]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomaswhitley.com/?p=103571288#comment-1033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry about your ankle, but let me know when y&#039;all get this way (i mean, you don&#039;t REALLY need to see your family do you?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about your ankle, but let me know when y&#8217;all get this way (i mean, you don&#8217;t REALLY need to see your family do you?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

