My Improved Desktop

3 07 2009

Desktop Screenshot

I used Rainmeter and the Enigma desktop to get the clock, date and weather. I had to do some customization to get it like I want – simple. Hey, it it works for me.

NOTE: The date in the upper right hand corner of the picture is not on my desktop, it is the date for the blog post.

NOTE: Notice that this post is titled “My Improved Desktop” as opposed to “New and Improved” since those terms should be seen as mutually exclusive. That is, something is either new or improved, not both. Since I already had the desktop it is not new, simply improved.





What Does It Mean?

2 07 2009

I’m deep in the process of studying for my MA comprehensive exams…sort of. Well, I’m studying at least, which is a good think since they are in 2 weeks. Today I have been studying for my Literature and Religion exam. This process has included re-reading texts that we read in that seminar and annotating them. Essentially that means that I am trying to identify the theme(s) of the text and make any notes that may be helpful should that text be one I have to write an essay on. This process brought an old question to the forefront of my mind, though. That question deals mainly with interpretation and what a text “means.”

I used to staunchly believe that the only real meaning a text could hold is what its author intended it to hold. Thus, when we read a text like “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner” by Samuel Taylor Coleridge we can see meaning behind the albatross and the wedding that the story-teller is at, but it isn’t really there and isn’t really significant unless the author intended it to be so. Over the years, however, my view has changed a bit. I now see that texts can have meaning that the author never intended or imagined. For example, Arthur Hugh Clough may never have intended for “Epi-Strauss-ium” to imply that certain things (the truth) can be more purely illuminated when other things are removed, but I, and many others, certainly read it that way today.

All of this has implications in other areas of reading besides British literature, though. Specifically, for religious folk the implications could be vast. The question is often asked in religious circles of “what a text means”. While the question may not be inherently flawed, the predilections that we bring to the question and our answers may be. For we are usually able to agree that a poem may mean something to me that the author never intended it to mean, but we are much less quick to say the same about a biblical passage. Why is that? Well, I know why it is. It is the question of the inerrancy of scripture and the question of inspiration. I must ask, though, are we as readers of the texts any less inspired today than the writers were when they wrote the text?

My wife is currently at the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship General Assembly in Houston, TX. She has been tweeting her experience, as have many others, and she tweeted a quote from one of the speakers earlier today:

@TrinityJoy: Younger… The Hebrew doesn’t paint the complete picture. There is room for you to tell the story, use imagination! #cbfassembly

While I know that this was spoken in a specific context, it highlights something very important. We lack imagination. If you prefer the less “crass” and more “spiritual” version, our faith is too small to handle an interpretation or understanding that we haven’t had drilled in our heads our entire lives. Why is that? Why are we so scared of non-traditional interpretations? Why are we so scared that we may see something in the text that actually is true and real even though we’ve never heard anyone else express that same view?

Most would respond to this by saying that we cannot be open to new and different interpretations because we are seeking “THE Truth”. To that I say, “good luck.” As for me, however, I will continue to find meaning in the text and that meaning just may not be what the author intended, but it doesn’t mean that it is any less true, any less real, any less meaningful. Watch out, though, because if we’re not careful we just may discover that God is bigger than one person; bigger than me, bigger than you.





Logos is giving away Bibles

2 07 2009

A lot of companies have begun marketing campaigns which include giving away some products for free. Some of these contests are specific to certain social networks (such as Twitter, Facebook, etc). Logos’ giveaway is a cross-platform giveaway. Logos is great software and is definitely worth checking out by anyone interested in deeper biblical study. Check out the information on the giveaway below:

Logos Bible Software is celebrating the launch of their new online Bible by giving away 72 ultra-premium print Bibles at a rate of 12 per month for six months. The Bible giveaway is being held at Bible.Logos.com and you can get up to five different entries each month! After you enter, be sure to check out Logos and see how it can revolutionize your Bible study.





Happy Father’s Day, Dad

21 06 2009

Me, Dad, Chad at Chad's Wedding

Thanks for teaching me how to be a man. I love you.

P.S. Mom, I know dad won’t see this unless you show him, so I’ll trust you to show him.





The Seriousness of Belief

19 06 2009

I am currently in that stage of my academic career where I am studying to take the comprehensive exams for my Master of Arts in Religion. It is quite stressful, but has also been an occasion for some reflections. One of the courses that I have taken and will take an exam on is Philosophy of Religion and the question that we will be asked to respond to deals with the relationship between belief and reason. Since that class the first person that comes to my mind when I am approached about the relationship between belief and reason is W. K. Clifford and his (to some) incendiary statement: “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for any one, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (The Ethics of Belief). That statement, however, will not be the topic of this post (I have many thoughts on that statement and will likely post about that later).

Instead, while reviewing Clifford’s “The Ethics of Belief” I came across another statement that struck me hard once upon a time and struck me hard again. That statement deals with a topic that underlies Clifford’s views of the ethics of belief, namely, the seriousness of belief (this is my categorization and not Clifford’s):

No real belief, however trifling and fragmentary it may seem, is ever truly insignificant; it prepares us to receive more of its like, confirms those which resembled it before, and weakens others; and so gradually it lays a stealthy train in our inmost thoughts, which may some day explode into overt action, and leave its stamp upon our character for ever.

The point that Clifford is trying to make and that we so often miss is that each and every belief we hold is vastly important. There are no minor beliefs. While I may disagree with Clifford on some things, I think he has this spot on. Much too often we hold beliefs with little understanding as to why and think that it’s really no big deal. Most of the people around us hold those same beliefs so they must be true, I needn’t question them. This is detrimental not just to those around us, but especially to ourselves. For the groundwork is being laid for beliefs of the same tenor to be held in the future.

We must not lightly accept beliefs. We must test all of our beliefs by the most rigorous standards we can and keep only the ones that have been proven worthy. Let me offer an example. One belief that gets a lot of press in my part of the country is the inerrancy of scripture. More people than not where I live hold to this belief, in my experience, but the majority of them hold to it quite lightly. By that I mean that they believe it with their mouths and, I suppose, partially with their heads, because they have heard it their whole lives and have never been given a good reason to question it (Insert rant: If people would but read their Bibles more they would not have to wait for someone else to suggest they question this belief and others). So, these people lightly accept this belief not understanding the consequences. Thus, having never questioned the belief they are met with a situation in which they have two highly undesirable (to them anyway) choices to choose from. The situation I am talking about usually involves an honest look at passages like the Joshua account of the conquest and God’s request that Joshua and his cohorts slay everyone in Jericho: men, women, children, livestock. The two undesirable options: 1) God really did ask Joshua to slay an entire city that did nothing wrong other than living in the land that God had promised to another people group, or 2) God didn’t do that and the Bible is untrue. The dichotomy I have set up is certainly a false dichotomy, but it is usually the one that people set up for themselves in this and similar situations. That situation is only possible because of the small and lightly held belief that the Bible is inerrant.

Some may accuse me of being extremist, but my experiences have supported the example I gave and have supported Clifford’s view of just how significant and serious each and every belief that we hold is. In a sermon that I recently preached (and posted here), I spoke of the importance of owning our faith, of knowing what we believe, what we don’t believe and why. There is perhaps no greater disservice to any belief system, religious or otherwise, than adherents holding to its beliefs without sufficient reason and without a full understanding of what the belief actually is and its fullest implications. Don’t be that person.





Win BibleWorks8

17 06 2009

To celebrate their first year of blogging, the folks over at Cal.vin.ist are giving away BibleWorks8, a fantastic Bible and other ancient texts software. I currently have, and use almost daily, BibleWorks7.

Cal.vin.ist First Anniversary Giveaway:

On the 12th of July 2008, I posted for the first time here at Cal.vini.st. Leading up to our first anniversary next month, I thought it fitting to have some celebrations. Several things will be happening here over the next month, not the least of which is that I am launching the Cal.vini.st First Anniversary Giveaway. Over the next month (June 12th – July 12th 2009) you have the opportunity to enter to win one of two major prizes.

Go check it out and enter.





Nazi Labor Camp Becomes Jewish Cemetery

16 06 2009

Haaretz has an article out today about a Nazi labor camp that is being turned into a Jewish cemetery. Here is a brief excerpt:

Former Nazi labor camp consecrated as Jewish cemetery:

A Nazi labor camp near Berlin where SS guards massacred more than one thousand inmates over 60 years ago was consecrated Tuesday as a Jewish cemetery.
The Lieberose camp, a satellite of the larger Sachsenhausen concentration camp north of Berlin, was open from 1943 to February 1945. During that time SS officers shot and killed 1,300 sick and invalid Jewish inmates.

This strikes me as an interesting move, but not a new technique when an oppressed group is working its way out of the oppression. That technique is to take what was used derogatorily previously and to claim it as their own. This can be seen among the American black community, having been called Negroes or niggers before as a derogatory term, many now refer to themselves and fellow black Americans by these names. I hope the analogy communicates and the point is not lost on the example. In this case, German Jews are taking what was already a cemetery and claiming it as their own, turning the table around, so to speak.

Are there other examples that you can think of of formerly oppressed groups using this technique to rise out of oppression and take ownership of what was once meant for harm against them?





No Explanations

8 06 2009

I don’t remember where I found this picture, but it is my desktop background currently. While it makes me laugh a little to myself every time I read it, sadly, this is how many churches operate.

NoExplanations





The Choice is Yours

8 06 2009

[The following is the manuscript that I preached at my church yesterday for Graduation Sunday]

The Choice Is Yours

7 June 2009

Frederick Buechner is an American writer and theologian. He was a novelist for years before he became a Presbyterian minister. Born in 1926, to date he has published more than 30 books. He has received 9 Honorary Doctorates, including one from Yale University and one from King’s College in London. He’s certainly no slouch and so when he says something many people tend to listen. He has enjoyed popularity for much of his life, first as a novelist and then as a theologian, refusing to let the two become mutually exclusive. I have not read Buechner voraciously, but I have read him some and there is a quote of his that seems especially appropriate for today, Graduation Sunday. It comes from his definition of vocation in Wishful Thinking: A Theological ABC. For you see, we are all at a crossroads, not just graduates. We need to know what we’re supposed to do. Rick Warren’s A Purpose Driven Life stayed on the New York Times’ Bestsellers List for over 2 years for a reason; people want an answer to the question of what to do with their life. You and I are no different. To this end, what Buechner wrote back in 1973 still rings true today:

There are different kinds of voices calling you to different kinds of work, and the problem is to find out which is the voice of God rather than of Society say,  or the Superego, or Self-Interest. By and large a good rule for finding out is this. The kind of work God usually calls you to do is work (a) that you need most to do and (b) that the world needs most to have done…The place God calls you to is the place where your deep gladness and the world’s deep hunger meet.

One of the great disservices that the church has done to Christian society (and society as a whole, I might add) is to perpetuate the idea that only those who are “ministers” are called by God. Everyone else, so the story goes, just picks something to do, but ministers have been set aside as more special, more prominent than everyone else. This simply is not true. I believe that everyone is called to do something. That calling may be a vocation or it may be something else. What we have to know is that we are all called. That, however, is the simple part.

The other side of the coin is more difficult. The scripture passage for this morning speaks to that aspect:

Joshua 24:15-24 Now if you are unwilling to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served in the region beyond the River or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you are living; but as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.”  16 Then the people answered, “Far be it from us that we should forsake the LORD to serve other gods;  17 for it is the LORD our God who brought us and our ancestors up from the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery, and who did those great signs in our sight. He protected us along all the way that we went, and among all the peoples through whom we passed;  18 and the LORD drove out before us all the peoples, the Amorites who lived in the land. Therefore we also will serve the LORD, for he is our God.”  19 But Joshua said to the people, “You cannot serve the LORD, for he is a holy God. He is a jealous God; he will not forgive your transgressions or your sins.  20 If you forsake the LORD and serve foreign gods, then he will turn and do you harm, and consume you, after having done you good.”  21 And the people said to Joshua, “No, we will serve the LORD!”  22 Then Joshua said to the people, “You are witnesses against yourselves that you have chosen the LORD, to serve him.” And they said, “We are witnesses.”  23 He said, “Then put away the foreign gods that are among you, and incline your hearts to the LORD, the God of Israel.”  24 The people said to Joshua, “The LORD our God we will serve, and him we will obey.”

The passage, I think, is fairly well-known. Many churches and homes have picked up part of this passage and displayed it very prominently. Verse 15, especially, has become ubiquitous in recent years. The church that I grew up in had signs that members could place in their yards with verse 15 on it.

The part of the verse that is usually highlighted, though, is “as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.” There is certainly nothing wrong with this statement or with Christians today using this statement as a statement of their position and beliefs. I think, however, that this statement is really not central to the point of this passage. The beginning of the verse, on the other hand, is central: “choose this day whom you will serve.” Joshua is not using mere rhetoric here, instead he is issuing a solid command. The people that he is speaking to have a choice to make, a real choice, a difficult choice. Joshua has made his choice, so now do they have to make their choice. And so now do we.

For us the choice may not be between following the LORD and following the gods that our ancestors worshipped, but we do have to make the choice. Sometimes the choice will be between friends and following the LORD; sometimes between our job and following the LORD; sometimes between our family and following the LORD; and then even sometimes between ourselves and following the LORD. I do not presume to know the exact choices you will have to make, but I do know that you will come to that crossroads, on more than one occasion, and you will have to make the choice.

Also, I am not going to stand up here and pretend that we should all make the same choices when presented with them. By that I mean that following the LORD will look different for all of us. I mentioned earlier that one of the great disservices that we have done to Christian society is by spreading the falsehood that only “ministers” are called by God. Another great disservice that has been done has been making people believe that if their walk with God doesn’t look a certain way, then they are doing something wrong. That view usually contains specific elements, such as praying for x amount of minutes a day, reading the Bible every day at the same time and having what we call a “quiet time”, coming to church every Sunday morning, every Sunday evening and every Wednesday evening and listening only to the “Christian” radio station. Now, please hear me out. I do not think that any of these things are bad; quite the contrary, I think they are all good things. The problem comes when these things become a checklist for what our Christian lives are supposed to look like. Doing all of these things is not me making a choice to follow the LORD, it is me making a choice to line myself up with the American Christian sub-culture.

What, then, does it look like for me to find that place where my “deep gladness and the world’s deep hunger meet”? I cannot answer that question for you, I can only answer it for me. For me it means I realize that my call to teach is just as much a call to ministry as was my previous call to preach. For me it means that I realize that while things like reading texts that are thousands of years old in their original languages and reading news from multiple perspectives and multiple countries and following the politics of our country and of other countries and reading the writings of theologians that lived hundreds of years ago and reading poetry may make a “geek”, they also make me truly glad. There are also aspects of my life that some may deem as “heretical”. For you see,  I read atheist websites on a regular basis and I very much appreciate what the Quran and Bhagavad Gita have to say and believe that we can learn much from them. These things make me happy and I see that there is certainly a need in our world for people who can understand contemporary issues in the bigger picture of history and so I try to fill that need the best I can. I also see that our world has a need for people who can think in many respects just like atheists and yet still maintain faith and so I try to fill that need the best I can. Our world also needs Christians who can view people of other faiths as still people who are worthy of human rights and human dignity just as Christians are, so I try to be that voice to people I meet. Understand this, I worship just as honestly and just as fully when I am studying ancient texts as when I am here singing songs on a Sunday morning. I am trying to be as fully alive and as fully a follower of the LORD as I possibly can be every day of my life. I have made my choice, now the choice is yours.

What makes you happy, truly happy? Is it cleaning, is it rocking children at the hospital, is it helping other people, is it being outside, is it doing “behind the scenes” work, is it working on vehicles? Examine your life and find out what makes you truly happy. My guess is that that’s where God is calling you. Then see how you can be most fully a follower of God there. It may mean that you are supposed to talk to other people about God while doing that, but it may not mean that. It may simply mean that that’s what you’re supposed to do. Nature honors God by doing what God created it do to. Birds, for example, honor God by being birds; by flying, by singing, by perching, by getting food for their young, etc. It is time for us to be who God made us to be.

Unlike a lot of other preachers and prominent Christian speakers, I will not act like I know what that is supposed to look like for you. Doing that would only serve to spread the message that more people should be like me and to get you off the hook. This is difficult stuff. I have had to wrestle and struggle with this in my own life and I continue to on a regular basis. I have made my choice, now the choice is yours.

Let me speak for a moment to our graduates specifically. Many of you have been involved in church for much of your life and that is surely laudable, but you are at one of those crossroads. You must make the decision to make your faith yours. You must own your faith. The faith that your parents or your grandparents have will not be adequate for you. You may very well end up at the same place that they are, but if you do not own that faith and make it your own and figure out why you believe what you believe and why you don’t believe what you don’t believe, then it will never mean anything to you. You will have made your choice, but it will not have been a choice to follow the LORD.

Let me tell you how it worked out for me. When I was 15 years old, I was at a weekend conference put on by a group called Shepherd Ministries. At the end of the conference, an altar call was given as was usual. I felt like I was supposed to make some kind of response, but I knew that I was a Christian and had no need to “rededicate” my life, so I just sat there. A lot of people responded to the call and went down to the front of the church. They were then taken out the back to talk with counselors. The speaker, then, issued another call. He said, and I’m paraphrasing, “Some of you out there know that God is calling you to do something, but you’re already a Christian. God is calling you to him. It may be to be a missionary or it may be to the ministry, but God is calling you to something different.” That was it. I responded. I went to the front of the church and was subsequently taken out of the back of the church to talk with a counselor. I told him that God had just called me to the ministry. I was young, 15, and I didn’t know exactly what that meant, but as I looked around me, all of the people that I knew that were in the ministry were either pastors or youth ministers, I knew I didn’t want to be a youth minister, so I said I wanted to be a pastor. (Funny how some things never change). From that point forward, then, my focus was becoming a pastor. Things began to change along the way though. I felt like I was doing all the right things, but it didn’t feel like me.

Things continued to change once I got in college. I was a business major, but had decided to take a religion course. I began learning things in that course that didn’t exactly mesh with what I had been taught growing up, but that the evidence did not lie about. I had a choice to make. And so, as a freshman in college who was about to change majors from Business Administration to Religious Studies I made my choice. “If my faith cannot stand up to these things that I am learning,” I said, “if it cannot stand up to history, then it is not a faith worth having”…and I was serious about it. I still am. One thing that is more important to me than anything else is integrity and I will not “believe” something because it’s what I’m supposed to believe if I know in my head and heart that it’s wrong. So I made my choice and I took the challenge.

I am a very different person today than I was in that classroom on the campus of UNC-Charlotte many years ago, but my faith has remained. It is different in some respects, but it is also stronger…much stronger. I know what I believe and what I don’t believe and I know why. It may change tomorrow, but for today I know these things. I made the choice to own my faith. What I learned from my parents and pastor and youth minister could not sustain me. It was not good enough for them to believe something and have convictions about it, I had to believe things for myself.

This is true for all of us here this morning. We cannot rely on what our parents say or what our Sunday School teachers say or what Leland says or what I say or what hymns that we sing say. Our faith must be our own. You must own your faith.

We have a choice to make this morning. “Choose this day whom you will serve.” Will you serve the viewpoints and beliefs of others or will you serve the LORD, making your relationship with God a relationship that is alive and dynamic? I have made my choice. Now, the choice is yours.





Peace in the Middle East

8 06 2009

There’s nothing like tackling God, religion and everything else. While, talking about peace in the Middle East is not as broad as the aforementioned topics, it is certainly very broad and very complicated. An article on Haaretz today talks about this issue, but in a way that many Americans will probably shudder at.

‘Obama Peace Push Will Fail Without Talking to Hamas’:

An exiled Hamas leader urged Barack Obama on Monday to talk directly with the militant group, saying it is the representative of the Palestinian people and the American president’s drive for Mideast peace is impossible without them.

This raises some interesting questions. Should America change it’s policy and begin talking with leaders of Hamas or should America continue to try to push Hamas out completely. In recent days, I have heard numerous people talking about the benefits to involving groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah in the peace talks, because that is the only way that concessions will be made and peace will ensue.

What do you think? Should the peace talks only concentrate on the political groups that America favors or should all of the groups be involved, even if they aren’t the favored children of America? It seems to me that involving as many groups as possible is a positive thing. Especially since there are examples of these sorts of talks working and formerly rebellious groups being included in the governmental systems that follow.

So, I’m curious how you would propose to bring about peace in the Middle East.

You can also follow Haaretz on Twitter: @haaretzonline.